Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy will come out in print sometime next year from NYU Press, but it's available online right now, for open review.

One of the key arguments in the book is that the "peer review of digital texts must be an open, conversational process, one that draws on the wisdom of a far greater number of readers than the usual two or three anonymous reviewers, one that focuses on discussion among the reviewers, and between the reviewers and the author, and one that allows the multiplicity of responses to a text to become part of the text itself."

Do you agree or disagree with this argument?

- Judy

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The University System of Georgia Share site uses an Evaluation Checklist to review content for posting . What do you think of this review checklist?

Reply to This

RSS

About

Jacky Hood Jacky Hood created this Ning Network.

Members

  • Sharon Schwarzmiller
  • Michael Boezi
  • Yeap Malyno
  • Happy About
  • jwyg
  • Howard Strang
  • José Erigleidson
  • Lisa Chamberlin
  • Ji Hea Jay Kim
  • Cathy Alfano
  • Jeff Johnson
  • Barbara Wilford

Blog Posts

Yeap Malyno

Valu of Smile

Posted by Yeap Malyno on December 1, 2009 at 9:33pm

Judy Baker

Bookshare Funded to Make Open Textbooks Accessible

Posted by Judy Baker on November 20, 2009 at 7:59am

© 2009   Created by Jacky Hood

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service